In the United States, Wyoming became the first state to ban the abortion pill

[ad_1]

A new victory for conservatives who intend to roll back access to abortion in the United States. Wyoming on Friday became the first US state to ban Abortion pills. Wyoming (West) Governor Mark Gordon called on lawmakers to go ahead and register A.J A comprehensive ban on abortion in the constitution of this state and presented to the electors.

This decision comes at a time when many opponents of abortion are seeking to ban abortion pills across the United States. After last year’s decision by the Supreme Court To bury the right to abortion at the federal level. Since then, fifteen states have decided to ban all pregnancy terminations on their territory.

Table of Contents

Access is already limited

A decision on this matter is also expected soon in the Amarillo District Court in Texas where an ultra-conservative federal judge must rule on a possible federal ban on mifepristone (RU 486). This pill, most commonly used for the medical termination of pregnancy, was authorized in 2000 by the US Medicines Agency (FDA).

Texas Federal Judge Matthew Kacsmarek can order it to be taken off the market nationwide. Texas lawmakers are also considering a proposal that would not only ban abortion pills, but also require state internet service providers to block access to sites where such pills are sold by mail order.

Mark Gordon, the governor of Wyoming, has announced that he has no intention of backing down in his fight against abortion. “I believe that all life is sacred and that everyone, including unborn children, should be treated with dignity and compassion,” he said Friday evening.

Since the US Supreme Court in June last year granted freedom of legislation to each state, about fifteen have had limited access to mifepristone by asking a doctor to provide it, according to the Guttmacher Institute think tank that advocates for women’s rights. for abortion.

If a Texas federal judge rules for a nationwide ban on abortion pills, abortion rights groups say it would have as much impact as last year’s Supreme Court ruling.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *